Title

Assessing a Temporary Isolation Room From an Infection Control Perspective: A Discussion Paper

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2017

Publication Details

This article was originally published as:

Mitchell, B. G., William, A. P., Wong, Z., & O'Connor, J. (2017). Assessing a temporary isolation room from an infection control perspective: A discussion paper. Infection, Disease and Health, Prepublished 6 July 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2017.06.003

ISSN: 2468-0451

Reportable Items

C1

Abstract

Introduction

Assessing the functionality and infection control implications of new technologies presents significant challenges. In this discussion paper, we present our approach to assessing infection control aspects of a new isolation room, the RediRoom™ (prototype). We report how we evaluated this room, lessons learnt and suggestions for future evaluations in this area.

Methods

There is no documented method for evaluating a novel temporary isolation room. We combined a range of existing tools to undertake a technical assessment. Three approaches were used, an assessment against standards or guidelines; professional assessment; and a cleaning assessment.

Results

To assess compliance against existing recommendations related to the built environment and isolation rooms, elements contained within Australasian and United Kingdom guidelines were used. We were able to identify which elements in these guidelines were of the most value and relevance. An ultraviolet (UV) solution with fluorescent light assessment was used to assess the ability to clean surfaces. This approach was a useful objective measure. A professional assessment is potentially subjective, but provides an opportunity to identify other potential issues and benefits. In this study, the RediRoom™ performed well against all three approaches. We identified limitations in using existing guidelines for a temporary isolation room.

Conclusion

In our study, the use of video and video reflexive ethnography for the professional assessment would have been useful. We propose a revised list of assessment against which new isolation solutions or technologies could be assessed, with the view of others continuing to build on this.

Comments

Used by permission: the authors.

© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control.

This article may be accessed from the publisher here.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).