Title

Reflexivity in Midwifery Research: The Insider/Outsider Debate

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2012

Publication Details

This article was originally published as:

Burns, E., Fenwick, J., Schmied, B. & Sheehan, A. (2012). Reflexivity in midwifery research: The insider/outsider debate. Midwifery, 28(1), 52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.018

ISSN:0266-6138

Abstract

Objective: to explore the challenges of conducting an observational study of postnatal interactions, between midwives and women, when the researcher was a midwife observing in familiar midwifery settings.

Background: participant observation conducted by researchers who are themselves midwives raises questions regarding the influence of ‘identity’ and ‘insider’ knowledge on the conduct of such projects. The insider/outsider status of researchers has been explored in other disciplines, yet this is an area which is underdeveloped in the midwifery literature where few attempts have been made to subject this issue to sustained analysis.

Design: a qualitative study (investigating the provision of breast-feeding support in the first week after birth) provided the opportunity for reflexive exploration of the tensions faced by midwife researchers.

Setting: two maternity units in New South Wales, Australia.

Participants: participants included 40 midwives and 78 breast-feeding women.

Findings: possessing ‘insider’ midwifery knowledge was advantageous in the ‘getting in’ and ‘fitting in’ phases of this research study however unanticipated role ambiguity, and moral and ethical challenges, arose as a result of this ‘insider’ knowledge and status. Prolonged periods of observation challenged the midwife researcher's preconceived ideas and early decisions about the advantages and disadvantages of being an ‘insider’ or an ‘outsider’ in the research setting.

Key conclusions: reflexive analysis of insider/outsider experiences revealed the middle ground which participant observers tend to navigate. Whilst professional insider knowledge and status offered many advantages, especially at the first study setting, some of the inherent embodied, and socially constructed features of the ‘midwife’ observer role, were unanticipated. Cultural competence, in these observational study settings, translated into role ambiguity, and at times, culturally entrenched role expectations.

Implications for practice: midwifery observation of clinical practice, for research, or practice development purposes, requires a degree of juggling of insider knowledge to facilitate observation and analysis. Prior to conducting observations midwives should consider how best to occupy the middle ground between insider and outsider. Within the middle ground the midwife can draw on those aspects of ‘self’ required to negotiate respectful relationships with colleagues, whilst also ensuring the maintenance of an analytical degree of distancing.[from publisher's webpage].

Comments

Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.

Staff and Students of Avondale College may access the full text of this article here.

This article may be accessed from the publisher here.