Reconsidering Cuneiform and Biblical Distanzangaben or "Long Period" References

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Unable to use the file because of accessibility barriers? Send us feedback

Publication Date

2017-01-01

relationships.isAuthorOf

Publisher

DOI

Rights

Used by permission: International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities

Copyright © 2017 IJRSSH

This article may be accessed from the publisher here.

Version

Published Version

Review Status

Peer Reviewed

Field of Education

Field of Research

Degree

Department

Faculty

Supervisor

Awarding Institution

Degree

Department

Faculty

Supervisor

Awarding Institution

Abstract

Long period dating references or Distanzangaben can be found in both cuneiform texts and the Masoretic Text of the Old Testament. In this article five of them are selected. One reference is about 800 years; another one 700 years; still another 600 years and a further one covering a long period of 3200 years, the last which is a case of a need for a better understanding of Ancient Mathematics or Counting systems. These texts were discovered, transliterated, translated and discussed or commented upon by many scholars since the middle of the 19th century. Scholars are divided into two or more camps regarding these periods in cuneiform references: those who tried to find historicity in them taking them at face value; those who reject them as bogus and just “round numbers”. Optimistic scholars and pessimistic scholars are divided by the epistemology they are operating as well as the methodology they are selecting to solve the problems. Those who are skeptical in hermeneutics will not utilize these texts to construct chronology. Those who are affirmative in hermeneutics will try to find solutions harmonizing some or all of them. It is with this last method that this research was approached. The axiom was entertained that if the ancient scholars knew astronomy, mathematics, and other sciences so well, then surely they would have taken great pain in recording their own history. This led to the investigation again of these Distanzangaben in the cuneiform tablets and a reconsideration of the chronology of the Old Testament long period dating references and making an attempt to link some kings between the cuneiform texts and the Masoretic Text. The case of Amraphel of Genesis 14 and Hammurabi of the Nabonidus text was such a link and the second one is the closeness of the Sumerian King List’s Flood date applying the year-day principle (1 day = 360 days of the calendar of the hemerological cuneiform texts) and the Masoretic Text chronology for the Flood. Someone once said that scientific pursuit is the case of “two men sitting behind bars: the one saw mud and the other one stars.”

Description

Research Statement

Citation

van Wyk, K. (2017). Reconsidering cuneiform and biblical distanzangaben or "long period" references. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 114-140. Retrieved from https://www.ijrssh.com

Source Title

International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities

Series

International Standard Serial Number

2249-4642

International Standard Book Number

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026