<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Model of Resilience in Family Caregivers of Relatives with Neurotrauma (Traumatic Brain Injury or Spinal Cord Injury): A Multigroup Analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Unable to use the file because of accessibility barriers? Send us feedback

Publication Date

2019-05-05

Publisher

DOI

Original

Rights

Used by permission: the author(s).

Version

Published Version

Review Status

Field of Education

Field of Research

Degree

Department

Faculty

Supervisor

Awarding Institution

Degree

Department

Faculty

Supervisor

Awarding Institution

Abstract

Objective. In a previous study, we found mediating variables (resilience, self-efficacy, hope, social support) were strongly associated with both positive and negative psychological outcomes among family caregivers of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Building on these results, the comparability of the model between caregivers for relatives with TBI and family caregivers of individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) was tested.

Methods. Structural equation modelling with multigroup analysis was conducted in a cross-sectional sample to test a hypothesised model of resilience. A total of 181 family members were recruited (131 TBI, 50 SCI) from 6 specialist rehabilitation services in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Assessments comprised the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Herth Hope Scale, Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey; and four measures of psychological adjustment including: Caregiver Burden Scale, Medical Outcomes Survey, General Health Questionnaire, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale.

Results. The model for the aggregated sample demonstrated a very good model fit (χ2 = 47.42, df = 39, ρ = 0.167, NFI = .962, IFI = .993, TLI = .985, CFI = .993, RMSEA = .035). The model accounted for 59% of the variance in resilience. Resilience was directly associated with caregiver positive affect and also played a protective role in relation to caregiver burden, as mediated through social support. Multi-group analysis showed neuroticism was significantly more influential on burden in family members supporting relatives with TBI than family members of individuals with SCI. Further, problem-focused coping was statistically more influential on positive affect in family members of individuals with TBI when compared to family members of individuals with SCI.

Conclusions. This is the first study to show neurological disability specific pathways underlying resilience and psychological adjustment in family caregivers of individuals with TBI or SCI. This study makes a contribution to better targeting strength based family support interventions.

Description

Research Statement

Citation

Anderson, M., Simpson, G., Daher, M., Jones, K., & Morey, P. (2019). Model of resilience in family caregivers of relatives with neurotrauma (Traumatic Brain Injury or Spinal Cord Injury): A Multigroup Analysis. Accepted abstracts from the International Brain Injury Association 13th World Congress on Brain Injury. Brain Injury, 33(Suppl. 1), 1-337. doi:10.1080/02699052.2019.1608749

Source Title

International Brain Injury Association 13th World Congress on Brain Injury

Series

International Standard Serial Number

1362-301X

International Standard Book Number

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026