Formative Research for the Development of an Eye Health Strategic Planning and Evaluation Framework and a Checklist: A Health Systems Approach
Publication Date
Authors
Avondale Authors
Publisher
Original
Rights
Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.
Version
Review Status
Field of Education
Field of Research
Degree
Department
Faculty
Supervisor
Awarding Institution
Degree
Department
Faculty
Supervisor
Awarding Institution
Abstract
This formative research process aimed to develop an Eye Health Strategic Planning and Evaluation Framework and indicator Checklist. The research process utilized a multi‐phased multiple methods approach including literature review, initial expert review (n = 27), findings from a Cambodian Avoidable Blindness Initiative demonstration project (2009‐2012), observation and analysis of four rural sites of the Indian LV Prasad Eye Institute Pyramid Model (n = 21), and finally, a critique by Cambodian government eye health professionals/staff (n = 15), health center staff and community representatives (n = 77) and patients (n = 62). Results from three Cambodian population‐based surveys (KAP n = 599, patient follow‐up n = 354, and RAAB 4650) also informed the development of the Framework and the Checklist. The Framework domains include: situation analysis, determinants of accessibility, service delivery systems, operation systems, networks and linkages, outcomes, and impact. Domains were subdivided into 59 components. The Checklist consists of 253 indicator items. The Eye Health Strategic Planning and Evaluation Framework and the Checklist can assist policy makers, program planners, and evaluators to develop a comprehensive whole of systems approach to eye health care to improve coverage and utilization of services.
Description
Research Statement
Keywords
Citation
Ormsby, G. M. (2019). Formative research for the development of an Eye Health Strategic Planning and Evaluation Framework and a Checklist: A health systems approach. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 34(2), e1356-e1375. doi:10.1002/hpm.2784