<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Efficacy of B vitamin supplementation on global cognitive function in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Unable to use the file because of accessibility barriers? Send us feedback

Publication Date

2025-12

Avondale Authors

Publisher

Oxford Academic

Rights

© 2025 The Authors.

Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable to download. Staff and Students of Avondale University may access the full text of the article via a Library Primo search. https://avondale.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61UNI_AVN/ij8cgg/alma991012585696202354

Version

Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM)

Review Status

Peer Reviewed

Field of Education

06 Health

Field of Research

3210 Nutrition and dietetics

Degree

Department

Faculty

Supervisor

Awarding Institution

Degree

Department

Faculty

Supervisor

Awarding Institution

Abstract

Context Elevated homocysteine levels are associated with brain atrophy and dementia, with B vitamin supplementation a possible low-cost intervention to help mitigate the deleterious impacts on brain health. However, prior meta-analyses have produced inconsistent results, with unexplained heterogeneity, while the quality of evidence has not been assessed.

Objective This systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression sought to quantify the effect of B vitamin supplementation on global cognitive function in older adults.

Data Sources PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2024.

Data Extraction Eligible RCTs were derived from populations aged ≥60 years, with interventions of 26 weeks or longer comprising vitamin(s) B6, B9, or B12 of any dose or administration route, compared with placebo or usual dementia care. Studies must also have quantified global cognitive function at baseline and at end of treatment.

Data Analysis Seventeen RCTs, including 5275 participants, were identified. A small to moderate improvement (Hedges’ g = 0.423; 95% CI: 0.188 to 0.657) in global cognitive function after supplementation was observed with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 92.71; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations [GRADE] = very low certainty). A meta-regression identified that statistical outliers and single-blinded studies contributed to the pooled g and heterogeneity. Omitting these studies resulted in a small effect (g = 0.110; 95% CI: 0.034 to 0.186), with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 15.39; GRADE = high certainty). The effect size did not differ between classifications of cognitive impairment (ie, intact cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia) in subgroup analysis (P = .729).

Conclusion The pooled findings indicated there is high-certainty evidence that vitamin B6, B9, or B12 supplementation has a very small benefit on global cognitive function in older adults.

Description

Research Statement

Citation

Berg, J., Grant, R., Siervo, M., Stephan, B. C. M., & Tully, P. J. (2025). Efficacy of B vitamin supplementation on global cognitive function in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews, 83(12), 2256–2267. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf155

Source Title

Nutrition Reviews

Series

International Standard Serial Number

International Standard Book Number

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026