<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Women’s Perceptions and Experiences of Breastfeeding Support: A Metasynthesis

avondale-bepress.context-key10908357
avondale-bepress.submission-pathnh_papers/156
avondale.affiliateSheehan, Athena; 0000-0002-2035-504X
avondale.departmentLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre
avondale.facultyNursing
avondale.reporting.isPeerReviewedPeer Reviewed
avondale.reporting.versionPublished Version
dc.contributor.authorDykes, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorMcCourt, Christine
dc.contributor.authorSheehan, Athena
dc.contributor.authorBeake, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorSchmied, Virginia
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T00:25:33Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T00:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-01
dc.date.submitted2017-10-16T16:40:33Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both peer and professional support have been identified as important to the success of breastfeeding. The aim of this metasynthesis was to examine women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support, either professional or peer, to illuminate the components of support that they deemed “supportive.”</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong> The metasynthesis included studies of both formal or “created” peer and professional support for breastfeeding women but excluded studies of family or informal support. Qualitative studies were included as well as large-scale surveys if they reported the analysis of qualitative data gathered through open-ended responses. Primiparas and multiparas who initiated breastfeeding were included. Studies published in English, in peer-reviewed journals, and undertaken between January 1990 and December 2007 were included. After assessment for relevance and quality, 31 studies were included. Meta-ethnographic methods were used to identify categories and themes.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong> The metasynthesis resulted in four categories comprising 20 themes. The synthesis indicated that support for breastfeeding occurred along a continuum from authentic presence at one end, perceived as effective support, to disconnected encounters at the other, perceived as ineffective or even discouraging and counterproductive. A facilitative approach versus a reductionist approach was identified as contrasting styles of support that women experienced as helpful or unhelpful.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The findings emphasize the importance of person-centered communication skills and of relationships in supporting a woman to breastfeed. Organizational systems and services that facilitate continuity of caregiver, for example continuity of midwifery care or peer support models, are more likely to facilitate an authentic presence, involving supportive care and a trusting relationship with professionals.</p>
dc.identifier.citation<p>Schmied, V., Beake, S., Sheehan, A., McCourt, C., & Dykes, F. (2011). Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: A metasynthesis. <em>Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 38</em>(1), 49-60. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x</p>
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x
dc.identifier.issn0730-7659
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.avondale.edu.au/handle/1897/10908357
dc.language.isoen_us
dc.provenance<p>This article was originally published as:</p> <p>Schmied, V., Beake, S., Sheehan, A., McCourt, C., & Dykes, F. (2011). Women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: A metasynthesis. <em>Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 38</em>(1), 49-60. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x</p> <p>ISSN: 1523-536X</p>
dc.relation.ispartofBirth: Issues in Perinatal Care
dc.relation.urihttps://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/3335/
dc.rights<p>Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.</p> <p>This article may be accessed from the publisher <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x">here.</a></p>
dc.subjectbreastfeeding
dc.subjectperception
dc.subjectexperience
dc.titleWomen’s Perceptions and Experiences of Breastfeeding Support: A Metasynthesis
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026