<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Testing a model of resilience in family members of relatives with Traumatic Brain Injury vs Spinal Cord Injury: Multigroup analysis

avondale-bepress.context-key25266877
avondale-bepress.submission-pathnh_papers/243
avondale.affiliateAnderson, Malcolm; 0000-0003-2963-7497
avondale.affiliateMorey, Peter; 0009-0005-5046-9581
avondale.departmentLifestyle Medicine and Health Research Centre
avondale.facultyNursing
avondale.reporting.isPeerReviewedPeer Reviewed
avondale.reporting.versionPublished Version
dc.contributor.authorMorey, Peter
dc.contributor.authorJones, Kate Fiona
dc.contributor.authorDaher, Maysaa
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Grahame K.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T00:33:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T00:33:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.date.submitted2021-10-04T19:38:43Z
dc.description.abstract<p><h3>Objective</h3></p> <p>To test a model comprising explanatory (neurologic impairment, coping, personality) and mediating (resilience, self-efficacy, hope, social support) variables on psychological adjustment and burden among family caregivers of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) vs spinal cord injury (SCI). <h3>Design</h3></p> <p>Structural equation modeling with multigroup analysis. <h3>Setting</h3></p> <p>Six rehabilitation centers across New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. <h3>Participants</h3></p> <p>A total of 181 family members (N=181; 131 TBI, 50 SCI). <h3>Interventions</h3></p> <p>Not applicable. <h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3></p> <p>Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Herth Hope Scale, Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey; and 4 measures of psychological adjustment including: Caregiver Burden Scale, Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36), General Health Questionnaire-28, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale. <h3>Results</h3></p> <p>The model for the aggregated sample demonstrated a very good model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>=47.42, df=39, ρ=0.167, normed fit index=.962, incremental fit index=.993, Tucker-Lewis index=.985, comparative fit index=.993, root-mean-squared error of approximation=.035). Multi-group analysis found significant commonalities in the pattern of relationships among variables across the 2 groups. In the only differences found, neuroticism was significantly more influential on burden in family members supporting individuals with TBI than family members of individuals with SCI. Furthermore, problem-focused coping was statistically more influential on positive affect in family members of individuals with TBI when compared with family members of individuals with SCI. <h3>Conclusions</h3></p> <p>The study found significant similarities in the patterns of resilience and psychological adjustment among family caregivers of individuals with TBI and SCI.</p>
dc.identifier.citation<p>Simpson, G, K., Anderson, M. I., Daher, M., Jones, K, F., & Morey, P. (2021). Testing a model of resilience in family members of relatives with Traumatic Brain Injury vs Spinal Cord Injury: Multigroup analysis. <em>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102</em>(12), 2325-2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.016</p>
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.016
dc.identifier.issn0003-9993
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.avondale.edu.au/handle/1897/25266877
dc.language.isoen_us
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.rights&copy; 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.
dc.subjectBrain injuries
dc.subjecttraumatic
dc.subjectCaregivers
dc.subjectEmotional adjustment
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectResilience
dc.subjectpsychological
dc.subjectSpinal cord injuries
dc.titleTesting a model of resilience in family members of relatives with Traumatic Brain Injury vs Spinal Cord Injury: Multigroup analysis
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026