Prescribers or Multidisciplinarians? An Evaluation of Brief Education for General Practitioners on Chronic Pain Management
Publication Date
Avondale Authors
Publisher
Original
Rights
Used by permission: the author(s) with the first publication rights granted to the journal.
Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learningis an open access publication, hosted by Sydney University Press and published by HETI, NSW Health. More information is available on the journal website: https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/HEP/index
Conditions of sharing are defined by the Creative Commons License Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Version
Review Status
Field of Education
Field of Research
Degree
Department
Faculty
Supervisor
Awarding Institution
Degree
Department
Faculty
Supervisor
Awarding Institution
Abstract
Purpose
Active pain self-management (PSM) for patients with chronic pain is assumed to require multidisciplinary care, leaving prescribing analgesics the most accessible option for general practitioners (GPs). We sought to upskill GPs in multimodalPSM with a harm minimisation approach for any opioid prescribing.
Design and Methodology
Having developed an educational training resource, a multidisciplinary team delivered the program to attendees at a GP conference in 2017. The educational package comprised pre-readings, a 6-hour interactive, skills-based workshop, and post-workshop resources. The single-group intervention was evaluated with an original and unvalidated pre/post-test (three months) survey of four domains: knowledge; attitudes; utilisation of strategies involving PSM and opioid harm minimization. Paired t-tests were conducted on each domain score and overall, with effect sizes assessed with Cohen’s d. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the data lacking a post-test survey response. Post-survey scores were imputed via chained regression equations, then paired t-tests analyses were conducted on imputed datasets using Rubin's method to pool estimates.
Findings
Of 99 participants, 33 returned both surveys for primary analysis. These were combined in the sensitivity analysis with 60 unpaired surveys. Internal consistency was modest (Cronbach’s alpha 0.736). Primary analysis demonstrated significant self-reported improvements in each educational domain with overall score increasing 10.54 points out of 130 (p
Discussion, Limitations and Conclusions
This study found that a brief GP educational package may be a viable intervention for facilitating PSM and promoting safer prescribing strategies. Outcomes at three months, from this unvalidated survey instrument, suggest improvements in knowledge, attitudes and self-reported facilitation of PSM and opioid prescribing. As this study did not measure clinician behaviour or patient outcomes objectively, further educational research is indicated to confirm these findings and identify how best to deliver chronic pain management training.
Description
Research Statement
Keywords
Citation
Holliday, S. M., Hayes, C., Jones, L. E., Gordon, J., Fraser, C., Harris, N., Nicholas, M., Holder, C., Oldmeadow, C., & Magin, P. (2020). Prescribers or Multidisciplinarians? An Evaluation of Brief Education for General Practitioners on Chronic Pain Management. Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning, 3(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.33966/hepj.3.1.14146