<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Coal Seam Gas Extraction: Does Landholder Compensation Match the Mischief?

avondale-bepress.context-key6663038
avondale-bepress.submission-pathadmin_conferences/5
avondale.affiliateWilliams, Anthony; 0000-0002-9918-4748
avondale.facultyAdministration
avondale.reporting.isPeerReviewedPeer Reviewed
avondale.reporting.versionPublished Version
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorMak, Michael Y.
dc.contributor.authorFibbens, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T00:39:20Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T00:39:20Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.date.submitted2015-02-15T20:47:01Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Coal seam gas (CSG) extraction is set for expansion in New South Wales. However, controversy accompanies its introduction in that the present law grants miners access to private lands for the purposes of exploration and production. The NSW Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 regulates compensation for land access, and a number of questions have been raised about the adequacy of its compensation provisions. Additionally, compensation for coal seam gas poses a challenge for the valuation profession in that valuation theory has yet to be developed in this emerging sphere of practice. This paper compares the legal and physical impacts of coal seam gas infrastructure on private lands with the current provisions of the NSW Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991 and questions if the present compensation provisions match the injury inflicted upon the holders of private land by coal seam gas occupation. The paper reviews the NSW legislation and case law relating to coal seam gas acquisition to identify the legal affects, whilst field observation and remote sensing techniques identify physical effects. The physical effects are then categorised according to the heads of compensation that apply to the compulsory taking of parts of property in Australia. A comparative analysis determines if all of the various “harms” that result from coal seam gas occupation are compensable under the current law. The research indicates that “severance” and “injurious affection” are key issues for landholder compensation where CSG plant occupies parts of land; however, the right to claim for “injurious affection” is unclear in the present legislation.</p>
dc.identifier.citation<p>Fibbens, M., Mak, M. Y., Williams, A. P. (2013). <em>Coal seam gas extraction: Does landholder compensation match the mischief?</em> Paper presented at the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.prres.net/</p>
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.avondale.edu.au/handle/1897/06663038
dc.language.isoen_us
dc.provenance<p>This conference paper was originally published as:</p> <p>Fibbens, M., Mak, M. Y., Williams, A. P. (2013). <em>Coal seam gas extraction: Does landholder compensation match the mischief?</em> Paper presented at the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.prres.net/</p>
dc.relation.ispartofPacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference
dc.rights<p>Used by permission: <a href="http://www.prres.net/">Pacific Rim Real Estate Society </a></p>
dc.subjectinjurious affection
dc.subjectseverance
dc.titleCoal Seam Gas Extraction: Does Landholder Compensation Match the Mischief?
dc.typeConference Publication

Files

Original bundle

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Williams_T_Coal_seam_gas_extraction.pdf
Size:
551.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026