Title

Reducing Urinary Catheter Use Using an Electronic Reminder System in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Stepped-wedge Trial

Author Faculty (Discipline)

Nursing

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-4-2019

Publication Details

This article was originally published as:

Mitchell, B. G., Northcote, M., Cheng, A. C., Fasugba, O., Russo, P. L., & Rosebrock, H. (2019). Reducing urinary catheter use using an electronic reminder system in hospitalized patients: A randomized stepped-wedge trial. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Prepublished 04 March 2019, doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.31

ISSN: 0899-823X

ANZSRC / FoR Code

111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)| 111716 Preventive Medicine| 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified| 060502 Infectious Agents

Avondale Research Centre

Lifestyle Research Centre

Reportable Items

C1

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness and ease of use of an electronic reminder device in reducing urinary catheterization duration.

Design: A randomized controlled trial with a cross-sectional anonymous online survey and focus group.

Setting: Ten wards in an Australian hospital.

Participants: All hospitalized patients with a urinary catheter.

Intervention: An electronic reminder system, the CATH TAG, applied to urinary catheter bags to prompt removal of urinary catheters.

Outcomes: Catheterization duration and perceptions of nurses about the ease of use.

Methods: A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the rate of removal of catheters. A phenomenological approach underpinned data collection and analysis methods associated with the focus group.

Results: In total, 1,167 patients with a urinary catheter were included. The mean durations in control and intervention phases were 5.51 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9–6.2) and 5.08 days (95% CI, 4.6–5.6), respectively. For patients who had a CATH TAG applied, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.91–1.14; P = .75). A subgroup analysis excluded patients in an intensive care unit (ICU), and the use of the CATH TAG was associated with a 23% decrease in the mean, from 5.00 days (95% CI, 4.44–5.56) to 3.84 days (95% CI, 3.47–4.21). Overall, 82 nurses completed a survey and 5 nurses participated in a focus group. Responses regarding the device were largely positive, and benefits for patient care were identified.

Conclusion: The CATH TAG did not reduce the duration of catheterization, but potential benefits in patients outside the ICU were identified. Electronic reminders may be useful to aid prompt removal of urinary catheters in the non-ICU hospital setting. (Received

Comments

Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.

Copyright © 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

This article may be accessed from the publisher here.

Share

COinS