Wells, AnneBrown, SaffronMcGregor, AlistairWare, ChrisMitchell, Brett G.2023-11-012023-11-012011-09-012014-08-26<p>MItchell, B. G., Ware, C., McGregor, A., Brown, S., & Wells, A. (2011). Clostridium difficile infection in Tasmanian public hospitals 2006-2010. <em>Healthcare Infection, 16</em>(3), 101-106. doi:10.1071/HI11009</p>1835-5617https://doi.org/10.1071/HI11009https://research.avondale.edu.au/handle/123456789/06041473<p>Objective To describe the current epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Tasmania Design, setting and participants Tasmania undertakes continuous surveillance for CDI at all public hospitals. Data on cases of CDI between 2006 and 2010 were examined. All positive tests occurring within 8 weeks of a previous case, and cases occurring in children less than 2 years old were excluded, consistent with national definitions. Only cases identified at public hospitals were included in the analysis Main outcome measures The rate of CDI in Tasmanian hospitals over the study period and the ability to demonstrate the effect of variances in surveillance definitions. Results A total of 357 cases of CDI were reported over the study period – a rate of 3.08 per 10 000 patient care days (95%CI 2.90–3.27) or 0.94 per 1000 patient separations (95%CI 0.91–0.98) for hospital-identified cases of CDI. Yearly rates for the period 2006 to 2010 were 2.3, 3.2, 2.8 and 3.9 per 10 000 patient care days, respectively. The overall trend was an increase in cases over the study period. The CDI rate from 2009–10 was significantly higher than that from 2008–09. Of the total cases reported,64% were healthcare-associated, healthcare-facility onset (HCAHFO), equating to a rate of 2.1 per 10 000 patient care days over the 4-year period. Conclusion The Tasmanian rate of HCA HFO is increasing, and appears to be greater than that reported by other Australian states, but is less than many northern hemisphere regions, where hypervirulent strains of C. difficile are causing increasing morbidity and mortality. It is difficult to compare reported rates of CDI nationally and internationally owing to inconsistencies in study duration, denominator selection, testing effort and testing methodology. This study demonstrates the need for national standards for CDI testing and reporting.</p>en-us<p>Due to copyright restrictions this article is unavailable for download.</p> <p>Copyright © 2011 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</p> <p>This article may be accessed from the publisher <a href="http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/HI11009.htm">here</a>.</p> <p>At the time of writing <em>Brett Mitchell</em> was affiliated with the Tasmanian Infection Prevention and Control Unit.</p>epidemiologyhealthcare associated infectioninfection controlsurveillanceJournal Article