<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Reactions, Reflections, and Responsibility: A Responsive Evaluation of an Emerging Blended E-learning Subject

avondale-bepress.context-key6705804
avondale-bepress.submission-pathedu_papers/71
avondale.affiliateFitzsimmons, Phil; 0000-0002-2014-9799
avondale.affiliateKilgour, Peter; 0000-0002-0042-5186
avondale.departmentChristian Education Research Centre
avondale.facultyEducation
avondale.reporting.isPeerReviewedPeer Reviewed
avondale.reporting.versionPublished Version
dc.contributor.authorFitzsimmons, Phil
dc.contributor.authorKilgour, Peter W.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T00:39:21Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T00:39:21Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.date.submitted2015-02-22T20:39:03Z
dc.description.abstract<p>In the decade since Schrum and Hong’s comment that “online learning has rapidly become a popular method of edu - cation for traditional and non-traditional students,” this approach to tertiary learning has morphed through several generational forms and platforms to the point where it has become firmly entrenched in the Australian tertiary landscape. As a broad generalization, e-learning, online, or flexible learning in many universities represents a spectrum of “information communications technology” (hereafter referred to as ICT) usage that ranges from little or no actual real-time interaction or “face-to-face” contact with associated viewing linkages such as YouTube through to teaching attempts at fully interactive programs. However, despite the numerous studies purporting the benefits of this form of study, a few voices have argued that this rapid shift has been “accepted uncritically.” Of late, there has also been a gathering chorus of research which suggests that the research base has been skewed, as it has not fully taken into account the understandings of the front-line users: the students themselves. This leads to the rationale of this article that what actually constitutes authentic “flexible learning,” its actual efficacy, and effects remain unclear. Emerging out of the context of standard online delivery is the notion of “blended learning” or “mixed mode learning.” In this learning mode, the ideal is that students retain some of the benefits of constant face-to-face interaction with peers and tutors, as well as the flexibility and less-restrictive nature of learning through technological access. However, blended learning in the Australian context has itself become situated across an ICT spectrum that ranges from the “provision of twoway communication so that the student may benefit from or even initiate dialogue” to the attempt at quasi-virtual situations of the “ClassSim” project.</p>
dc.identifier.citation<p>Kilgour, P., & Fitzsimmons, P. (2014). Reactions, reflections, and responsibility: A responsive evaluation of an emerging blended e-learning subject. T<em>he Journal of Adventist Education, 77</em>(2), 38-47.</p>
dc.identifier.issn0021-8480
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.avondale.edu.au/handle/1897/06705804
dc.language.isoen_us
dc.provenance<p>This article was published as:</p> <p>Kilgour, P., & Fitzsimmons, P. (2014). Reactions, reflections, and responsibility: A responsive evaluation of an emerging blended e-learning subject. T<em>he Journal of Adventist Education, 77</em>(2), 38-47.</p> <p>ISSN: 0021-8480</p>
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Adventist Education
dc.rights<p>Used by permission: <a href="http://jae.adventist.org">The Journal of Adventist Education </a></p> <p>This article was originally published in TEACH Journal of Christian Education and reprinted in The Journal of Adventist Education with permission of the authors.</p>
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjecte-learning
dc.subjectclassroom
dc.titleReactions, Reflections, and Responsibility: A Responsive Evaluation of an Emerging Blended E-learning Subject
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JAE_Reactions__Reflections__and_Responsibility_Peter_Kilgour_and_Phil_Fitzsimmons_pp._38_47.pdf
Size:
2.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Avondale University acknowledges our Sovereign God as Creator and Provider of all things. We respectfully acknowledge the Awabakal and Darramuragal people as the traditional custodians of the lands on which we live, work, study and worship across our Lake Macquarie and Sydney campuses. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging, and extend that respect to all First Nations People.

Aboriginal Peoples are advised the Library Collection contains images, voices and names of deceased people in physical and online resources. The Library recognises the significance of the traditional cultural knowledges contained within its Collection. The Library acknowledge some materials contain language that may not reflect current attitudes, was published without consent or recognition, or, is offensive. These materials reflect the views of the authors and/or the period in which they were produced and do not represent the views of the Library.

Avondale University is a member of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist system of universities and colleges.

CRICOS Provider No.: 02731D. RTO: 91191. TEQSA: PRV12015. ABN: 53 108 186 401.

© Avondale University Ltd 2026