Bay

avondale-bepress-to-dspace.facultyArts
avondale-bepress-to-dspace.summary<p><strong>Research Background</strong></p> <p>Paintings which by nature are amassed from layers of deposited brushstrokes, have traditionally worked from the ‘ground’ to the ‘figure’ in the sense of differentiating figure/ground relationships in a work. Such an approach to paintings destroys much of the underpainting in a work for the purpose of resolving the compositional/aesthetic concerns of the artist. This body of work aims to employ a methodology of practice whereby the initial underpainting of a work is celebrated quite tangibly and visibly, in the final configuration of a work.</p> <p><strong>Research Contribution</strong></p> <p>The painting <em>Bay</em>, incorporates a combination of methodologies for its fabrication. The first of these is the notion of constructing a field of underpainting, and the second is the incorporation of a ground which is applied over the top of this underpainting, except for those areas which remain visible underpainting. In this manner, the underpainting forms the ‘figure’ in the sense of ‘figure/ground’ relationship in the work, which equates to a kind of working in reverse to traditional painting practice. Further to this, alterations to the ‘figure’ of the work were conducted by removing sections of ‘ground’ rather than applying further paint. Here too sgraffito; itself a convention of erasure or a means of removing paint, played a reversed role in the final appearance of the work, accompanying more conventional brushstrokes with incised delineations in the final configuration of the work.</p> <p><strong>Research Significance</strong></p> <p>The significance of this research is that it typifies a kind of reversal of a traditional painting methodology which works from the ground, or ‘back’, to the figure, or ‘front’ of a painting. <em>Bay</em>, along with other works in this exhibition, can be seen to have value that the work was given the main exhibition wall at the Robin Gibson Gallery.</p>
avondale-bepress.abstract<p>Paintings, such as Bay, which by nature are amassed from layers of deposited brushstrokes, have traditionally worked from the ‘ground’ to the ‘figure’ in the sense of differentiating figure/ground relationships in a work. Such an approach to paintings destroys much of the underpainting in a work for the purpose of resolving the compositional/aesthetic concerns of the artist. This body of work aims to employ a methodology of practice whereby the initial underpainting of a work is celebrated quite tangibly and visibly, in the final configuration of a work.</p>
avondale-bepress.articleid1013
avondale-bepress.authorsRichard Morris
avondale-bepress.context-key6431671
avondale-bepress.coverpage-urlhttps://research.avondale.edu.au/arts_creativeworks/17
avondale-bepress.document-typecreativework
avondale-bepress.field.author_faculty_disciplineArts
avondale-bepress.field.comments<p>Used by permission: the artist</p>
avondale-bepress.field.creator<p><strong>Research Background</strong></p> <p>Paintings which by nature are amassed from layers of deposited brushstrokes, have traditionally worked from the ‘ground’ to the ‘figure’ in the sense of differentiating figure/ground relationships in a work. Such an approach to paintings destroys much of the underpainting in a work for the purpose of resolving the compositional/aesthetic concerns of the artist. This body of work aims to employ a methodology of practice whereby the initial underpainting of a work is celebrated quite tangibly and visibly, in the final configuration of a work.</p> <p><strong>Research Contribution</strong></p> <p>The painting <em>Bay</em>, incorporates a combination of methodologies for its fabrication. The first of these is the notion of constructing a field of underpainting, and the second is the incorporation of a ground which is applied over the top of this underpainting, except for those areas which remain visible underpainting. In this manner, the underpainting forms the ‘figure’ in the sense of ‘figure/ground’ relationship in the work, which equates to a kind of working in reverse to traditional painting practice. Further to this, alterations to the ‘figure’ of the work were conducted by removing sections of ‘ground’ rather than applying further paint. Here too sgraffito; itself a convention of erasure or a means of removing paint, played a reversed role in the final appearance of the work, accompanying more conventional brushstrokes with incised delineations in the final configuration of the work.</p> <p><strong>Research Significance</strong></p> <p>The significance of this research is that it typifies a kind of reversal of a traditional painting methodology which works from the ground, or ‘back’, to the figure, or ‘front’ of a painting. <em>Bay</em>, along with other works in this exhibition, can be seen to have value that the work was given the main exhibition wall at the Robin Gibson Gallery.</p>
avondale-bepress.field.custom_citation<p>Morris, R. (2011). <em>Bay</em> [Oil & enamel on board]. Robin Gibson Gallery, Sydney, Australia.</p>
avondale-bepress.field.embargo_date2014-12-07T00:00:00Z
avondale-bepress.field.field_of_education10 Creative Arts
avondale-bepress.field.for190502 Fine Arts (incl. Sculpture and Painting)
avondale-bepress.field.ntroCreative Work - Visual Art
avondale-bepress.field.publication_date2011-05-01T00:00:00Z
avondale-bepress.field.qualityDisseminated via nationally recognised outlet or entity
avondale-bepress.field.source_publication<p>This creative work was originally published as:</p> <p>Morris, R. (2011). <em>Bay</em> [Oil & enamel on board]. Robin Gibson Gallery, Sydney, Australia.</p>
avondale-bepress.fulltext-urlhttps://research.avondale.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&amp;context=arts_creativeworks&amp;unstamped=1
avondale-bepress.label17
avondale-bepress.native-urlhttps://research.avondale.edu.au/context/arts_creativeworks/article/1013/type/native/viewcontent
avondale-bepress.publication-date2011-05-01T00:00:00Z
avondale-bepress.publication-titleArts Creative Works
avondale-bepress.statepublished
avondale-bepress.submission-date2014-12-07T21:18:39Z
avondale-bepress.submission-patharts_creativeworks/17
avondale-bepress.titleBay
avondale-bepress.typearticle
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T00:38:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T00:38:49Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-01
dc.date.submitted2014-12-07T21:18:39Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Paintings, such as Bay, which by nature are amassed from layers of deposited brushstrokes, have traditionally worked from the ‘ground’ to the ‘figure’ in the sense of differentiating figure/ground relationships in a work. Such an approach to paintings destroys much of the underpainting in a work for the purpose of resolving the compositional/aesthetic concerns of the artist. This body of work aims to employ a methodology of practice whereby the initial underpainting of a work is celebrated quite tangibly and visibly, in the final configuration of a work.</p>
dc.identifier.citation<p>Morris, R. (2011). <em>Bay</em> [Oil & enamel on board]. Robin Gibson Gallery, Sydney, Australia.</p>
dc.identifier.urihttps://research.avondale.edu.au/handle/123456789/06431671
dc.language.isoen_us
dc.provenance<p>This creative work was originally published as:</p> <p>Morris, R. (2011). <em>Bay</em> [Oil & enamel on board]. Robin Gibson Gallery, Sydney, Australia.</p>
dc.rights<p>Used by permission: the artist</p>
dc.titleBay
dc.typeCreative Work
Files
Original bundle
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Morris__R_Bay.jpg
Size:
24.34 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Morris__R_Bay.pdf
Size:
32.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format