Arrhenius and Armstrong: How Active Opponents in the History of Chemistry Became Major Contributors to Modern Electrolyte Chemistry

Publication Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Peer Review Status
Before publication

Due to copyright restrictions this book chapter is unavailable for download.

Copyright © 2013 University of Sao Paulo Press

This book can be accessed from the publisher here.


In the late 19th and early 20th centuries Svante Arrhenius and Henry Armstrong understood the dissolution process of salts in water quite differently. Arrhenius saw the dissolution process as one whereby the salt partially dissociated into its ions and Armstrong saw the dissolution process as one whereby the salt associated itself with water. History is somewhat kinder to Arrhenius than it is to Armstrong in that Arrhenius won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1903 for his electrolytic dissociation theory whereas Armstrong was considered of a 'hot air balloon' who made it his business to oppose every new thought in chemistry. In the 1920s Arrhenius' view of partial dissociation was replaced by a view of total dissociation for strong electrolytes with activity and osmotic coefficients being used to account for non-ideal solution behaviour. However, recent research has shown that strong 1:1 electrolytes are best understood by using Arrhenius' original idea of partial dissociation rather than total dissociation and Armstrong's idea of hydration. This strange confluence of factors has important implications for chemical epistemology and its role in chemistry education.

science, historical developments

de Berg, K. C. (2013). Arrhenius and Armstrong: How active opponents in the history of chemistry became major contributors to modern electrolyte chemistry. In C. C. Silva & M. E. B. Prestes (Eds.), Learning science and about its nature: Historical and philosophical approaches (pp. 83-95). Sao Paulo, Brazil: University of Sao Paulo Press.

International Standard Serial Number
International Standard Book Number